Rental with driver Rome: The service is governed by the law of 15 January 1992 n.21, by the Lazio Region Law number 58 of 26 October 1993 and ss. mm. ii.
The car rental service with driver is defined as a non-scheduled public bus service and ensures the collective or individual transport of people with a complementary and supplementary function to public scheduled transport.
It is aimed at specific users for a timed service and / or a trip and the parking of the vehicles used for use takes place inside the remittances.
The authorizations for the rental service with driver in Rome are issued by the municipal administrations, through calls for tenders, to individuals with the requisites established by law, including the main ones:
Having reached the age of twenty-one;
Be in possession of a category B driving license;
Be in possession of the professional qualification certificate;
Be registered with the Roll of Drivers;
Have a suitable garage available for parking and sheltering the vehicle.
Rental with driver Rome: According to the provisions of article 13 of law n.21 of 15 January 1992, the cost of transport for the rental service with driver in Rome is directly agreed between the user and the carrier.
The cars registered for the service are characterized by the following characteristics:
Inside the windscreen and on the rear window, a sign with the word RENTAL;
On the rear plate of the car, the coat of arms of the Municipality that issued the authorization with its progressive number.
Over the years, numerous changes have been made to the oldest regulations, among which the following stand out:
Law Decree number 207 of 30 December 2008 (by abbreviation 1 Quater);
Law Decree 143 of 2018 “Urgent provisions on non-scheduled public bus services”.
The latter changes that limit and penalize the performance of the service, have been the subject of legal disputes to such an extent that the Calabria Region, with the support of trade associations, had to appeal to the Constitutional Court with the intention of making the rules less restrictive. cited above.
The decision of the Court with sentence number 56 of 2020 establishes illegitimate the obligation to return to a NCC remittance between one service and another.